Mingge Xu vs Indianna Spink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 08:27 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Xu vs I. Spink

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Xu 1 - 0 Spink
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mingge Xu winning 2 and Indianna Spink winning 0. The last match between Mingge Xu and Indianna Spink was at the W35 Birmingham, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mingge Xu getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Xu | 1 |
| Spink | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Birmingham(10-14-25)
M. Xu vs I. Spink H2H Profile
M. Xu vs I. Spink Match Preview:
- Does performance on second serves indicate anything about likely success? Indianna Spink's recent second serve points win rate is 39.89%, higher than Mingge Xu's 35.31%, which suggests a potential advantage.
- What about their recent performance in return games? Indianna Spink has won 54.64% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Mingge Xu's 52.12%.
- Interestingly, in first serve returns, Mingge Xu has a slight edge, winning 33.98% compared to Spink's 31.02%.
- Regarding handling pressure, Indianna Spink has saved 47.37% of breakpoints, a bit better than Mingge Xu's 44.52%.
- Overall match winning percentage over the past year shows Mingge Xu at 59.46%, outperforming Indianna Spink's 53.13%.
- How about preferred surfaces? Both players shine on different surfaces; Spink excels on indoor hard courts, while Xu prefers hard courts in general.
- In terms of tournament level performances, Mingge Xu has a higher win rate of 63.64% in Challengers/ITF events compared to Spink's 55.00%.
- Quality of opponents faced shows Indianna Spink has competed against more highly ranked opponents, with an average rank of 272.81, than Xu’s 356.62.
- If the match goes the distance, Mingge Xu has a better record in deciding sets, winning 60%, compared to Spink's 50%.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the recent performance data and overall trends, both players display strengths in different areas. Indianna Spink demonstrates a stronger second serve performance and returns well against opponents' second serves, which could provide her with an edge during crucial moments.
Mingge Xu, however, shows superior performance in terms of overall win rate and competence in deciding sets, suggesting resilience and consistency under pressure. With her better record at the Challengers/ITF level, Xu might feel more comfortable maintaining momentum throughout the match.
Given the facts, while Indianna Spink could capitalize on her return game, Mingge Xu is most likely to win this upcoming match due to her consistent performance and ability to thrive in tight sets.
Mingge Xu vs Indianna Spink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Xu vs I. Spink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:24:45 | Average Match Time | 1:24:45 |
| 60% (31/52) | 1st Serve % | 60% (39/65) |
| 81% (25/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (24/39) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 45% (29/65) | Return Points Win % | 31% (16/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Xu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
F | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
SF | W | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
I. Spink Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||

M. Xu vs I. Spink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.42% (58/38) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.00% (24/26) |
| 59.55% (131/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.28% (56/60) |
| 54.11% (1060/899) | Games Win/Loss | 49.45% (537/549) |
| 65.22% (30/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.71% (16/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 67.65% (23/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 31.25% (5/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 296 | Aces Total | 63 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
| 366 | Total Double Faults | 222 |
| 1:35:56 | Average Match Time | 1:9:41 |
| 425.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.82 |
| 58% (3506/6000) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1437/2372) |
| 65% (2287/3506) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (918/1437) |
| 45% (1134/2494) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (386/935) |
| 49% (375/763) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (124/244) |
| 46% (2786/6080) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1002/2257) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.56% (51/28) | Challenger W/L | 47.06% (16/18) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 61% (58/95) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (24/50) |
| 58% (7/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 48% (14/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 84% (58/49) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (23/20) |
| 16% (58/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (23/3) |
| 24% (38/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (27/4) |